ABSTRACT
AIMS: Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug used to treat some forms of severe epilepsy in children. The main adverse effect is ocular toxicity, which is related to the cumulative dose. The aim of the study is to identify an acceptable exposure range, both through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model of vigabatrin in children enabling us to calculate patient exposure and through the study of therapeutic response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study including children with epilepsy followed at Necker-Enfants Malades hospital who had a vigabatrin assay between January 2019 and January 2022. The population pharmacokinetic study was performed on Monolix2021 using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Children treated for epileptic spasms were classified into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether the spasms resolved, in order to identify an effective plasma exposure range. RESULTS: We included 79 patients and analysed 159 samples. The median age was 4.2 years (range 0.3-18). A 2-compartment model with allometry and creatinine clearance on clearance best fit our data. Exposure analysis was performed on 61 patients with epileptic spasms. Of the 22 patients who responded (36%), 95% had an AUC0-24 between 264 and 549 mg.h.L-1. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic model allowed us to identify bodyweight and creatinine clearance as the 2 main factors explaining the observed interindividual variability of vigabatrin. An acceptable exposure range was defined in this study. A target concentration intervention approach using this pharmacokinetic model could be used to avoid overexposure in responder patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Corticosteroids are the first-line immunosuppressants in the management of juvenile myasthenia gravis despite their adverse effects. The place of new immunosuppressive therapies is not clearly defined by the last international consensus held in March 2019 due to the lack of clinical trials. The aim of this study is to describe the use of rituximab and its efficacy and safety in 8 main pediatric centers of the French neuromuscular reference network to propose a new place in the therapeutic strategy of juvenile myasthenia gravis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study from January 1, 2009, to April 30, 2020, including a large cohort of children with myasthenia gravis in 8 main French pediatric reference centers of the FILNEMUS network. The type of myasthenia, different lines of immunosuppressive treatment, and clinical course of the patients were collected. To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab, we studied the clinical course of patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Outcome was defined as the clinical and therapeutic status of patients at the last visit: stable without immunosuppressants, stable with immunosuppressants, or unstable. RESULTS: We included 74 patients: 18 children with ocular form and 56 children with generalized form. Of the 37 patients who required immunosuppressive therapy, 27 were treated with rituximab. Patients treated with rituximab had a better outcome than patients treated with conventional immunosuppressants (p = 0.006). The use of rituximab as a first-line immunosuppressant showed a better efficacy with a discontinuation of immunosuppressants in 75% of patients (vs 25%, p = 0.04) and results in cortisone sparing (42% vs 92%, p = 0.03) compared with rituximab treatment as a second- or third-line immunosuppression. Rituximab was well tolerated; no adverse effect was observed. DISCUSSION: The use of rituximab has increased in France over the last 10 years as a first-line immunosuppressant. This study suggests good tolerability and efficacy of rituximab in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Early use appears to improve outcomes and facilitate cortisone sparing in antibody-positive generalized juvenile myasthenia. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for children with MG, rituximab is effective and well tolerated.
